<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Piraguablog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.piragua.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.piragua.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 10:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Grails domain class has more properties than you think! by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.piragua.com/2008/06/10/grails-domain-class-properties/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piragua.com/blog/?p=21#comment-29</guid>
		<description>It's a custom builder</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a custom builder</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Your Grails domain class has more properties than you think! by Andres Almiray</title>
		<link>http://www.piragua.com/2008/06/10/grails-domain-class-properties/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Andres Almiray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 04:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piragua.com/blog/?p=21#comment-28</guid>
		<description>By domain builder you actually mean Grails' DomainBuilder or a custom builder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By domain builder you actually mean Grails&#8217; DomainBuilder or a custom builder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Viewing the source of a compiled GSP in Grails by ClutchControl</title>
		<link>http://www.piragua.com/2008/03/15/viewing-the-source-of-a-compiled-gsp-in-grails/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>ClutchControl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piragua.com/2008/03/15/viewing-the-source-of-a-compiled-gsp-in-grails/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>As of Grails 1.0.3 line numbers are apparently appended to each line. No more cop/paste to the editor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of Grails 1.0.3 line numbers are apparently appended to each line. No more cop/paste to the editor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Viewing the source of a compiled GSP in Grails by Shawn Hartsock</title>
		<link>http://www.piragua.com/2008/03/15/viewing-the-source-of-a-compiled-gsp-in-grails/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Hartsock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piragua.com/2008/03/15/viewing-the-source-of-a-compiled-gsp-in-grails/#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Wow, nice. You just blew my mind. I was wondering how to get at those compiled sources. Is this documented? Wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, nice. You just blew my mind. I was wondering how to get at those compiled sources. Is this documented? Wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The elusive HTML &#8216;id&#8217; attribute when using &#60;g:form&#62; by ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.piragua.com/2008/04/14/the-elusive-html-id-attribute-when-using/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 21:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://piragua.com/2008/04/14/the-elusive-html-id-attribute-when-using/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I found that disturbing when I first ran into it as well.  Why id??  why not some other name and leave the "id" attribute to fall through.  I guess in the end its no big deal, but on my current project we've got a front-end guy  but the id field was really throwing him for a loop.
for some reason he was hung up on "action" as well...not sure why...

Anyway its good to know I wasn't the only one who thought that as odd, and I see we both skinned that cat in the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found that disturbing when I first ran into it as well.  Why id??  why not some other name and leave the &#8220;id&#8221; attribute to fall through.  I guess in the end its no big deal, but on my current project we&#8217;ve got a front-end guy  but the id field was really throwing him for a loop.<br />
for some reason he was hung up on &#8220;action&#8221; as well&#8230;not sure why&#8230;</p>
<p>Anyway its good to know I wasn&#8217;t the only one who thought that as odd, and I see we both skinned that cat in the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
